Cypress vs WebdriverIO Key Differences

In this article, We will discuss the cypress Vs webdriverIO software. I will explain the working of cypress, its limitations, key features, and the difference between cypress Vs webdriverIO. Based on this, you can choose which one is better for you.

Why Compare Cypress and WebdriverIO?

As both the software are automation testing software. One has a disadvantage or advantage over the other. Comparison is necessary to get to know which one is best for your project. Because some projects don’t work or are suitable to work on cypress and vice-versa. If you get an understanding of both of the software, then it will be easy to choose the suitable software for your project.

What is Cypress?

Cypress is a very demandable software these days. It is an end-to-end automation framework. The programming language cypress supports JavaScript and TypeScript. It is built on nodeJS. Cypress got lots of users due to its incredible features like time travel, automatic waiting, debuggability, stable test run, and screen capture.

But every software has its features and limitations also. Let’s discuss: –

Key features of cypress

  1. The Setup is friendly for beginners For example; anyone can easily understand the basic functionality of cypress.
  2. The software is not dependent on a selenium web driver.
  3. The test written in cypress are easy to understand and any beginner can understand them.
  4. Unlike selenium, it has to automate the waiting feature.
  5. Cypress also retries automatically.
  6. The test runner is interactive.
  7. It does support API testing.

qa automation testing services

Limitations of cypress

  1. Cypress support currently only chrome family browsers and firefox.
  2. You can not interact with multi-tab or multi-window in cypress.
  3. Cross-origin restrictions.
  4. Built-in parallelization is not supported.

What is WebdriverIO?

Like cypress, webdriverIO is also an end-to-end automation testing framework. The organization which owns the software is OpenJS. Currently, OpenJS is non-profitable. OpenJS follow W3 recommendations for architectural designs. It is based on the nodeJS application, which provides testing on JavaScript and TypeScript. WebdriverIO is used with Webdriver Protocol because it provides features like cross-browser testing. It is an open-source application and doesn’t offer and commercial option.

Now let’s discuss the features and limitations of webdriverIO.

Key features of WebdriverIO

  1. Beginners can easily understand the setup.
  2. It also supports built-in waits and retries.
  3. It needs an external library.
  4. JS users can easily understand the test created in it.
  5. User custom implementation.

Limitations of WebdriverIO

  1. Debugging the test is difficult.
  2. It doesn’t have any paid features.
  3. It contains a lot of customizations which can lead to confusion.
  4. Async-await syntax can be confusing for beginners.
  5. CLI test runner only.

Comparison of Cypress Vs WebdriverIO

Below are the key differences between Cypress vs WebdriverIO

Features Cypress WebDriverIO
GitHub stars 41,036 7,729
Test readability Easy to read Difficulty in reading
Dependency on selenium Not dependent Dependent
Test Runner Real-time test runner CLI test runner
API testing Default support No support
Paid features Yes No
Browser support Support chromium family only Support chrome family as well as
other
Mobile support Don’t support mobile application Support mobile application
Iframe support Difficult to work Easy to work on iFrame
Lighthouse report Supported Supported
Parallelization Support with paid Free to use
Reporters Spec, Mocha, Custom Spec, Allure, Portal, and 10-15 more
Locator support Xpath, CSS selector Xpath, CSS selector

Conclusion:

If you have to pick one, make sure you ask this question. What are the requirements? – Based on this go through the list that I just went over accordingly. Whichever the team thinks is a good option. You can pick that one. But do not pick just because that one is popular or you know how to work with it.

Read Also:

1) Cypress Vs Selenium – Key Differences

2) TestNG in Selenium – A Brief Guide

Diksham

Diksham works as a QA Automation Engineer at QACraft. He is a mechanical engineer with a degree. He has one year of experience in manual testing. Currently, he is learning automation testing by taking on new challenges day by day and improving his skills. In his free time, he loves to travel.

https://qacraft.com/author/diksham/